Academic research paper on FIFA (Business Ethics)

The focus of this paper is academic references 1 and 2 (attached). The paper must demonstrate an understanding of the nature andrelevance of risk, the importance of risk analysis and management and corporate governance within the context of accountabilityframeworks. The paper must use a variety of academic references to support and give context to all aspects of this assignment.(Discussion, analysis, comparison)Referring to the following web link as a beginning on the investigation of Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)http://www.fifa.com/governance/how-fifa-works/the-reform-process.html• Briefly discuss the nature and relevance of risk to corporate accountability.• Taking a holistic approach to the topic of risk, critically analyse the issues for executive decision making in relation torisk management and stewardship of company resources. This discussion should include reference to risk management frameworks andtheories and a discussion of at least two risks identified within FIFA, why they occurred and suggestions for how they could have beenmanaged from the FIFA material.• Compare and contrast the FIFA approach to corporate governance including board performance in the light of corporate governancetheories and the information contained in the articles below as well as other articles from your own research.Strategic HR Review (attached)Human Resource Management International Digest (attached)This paper must use the case study to illustrate their discussions.The report must be approximately 4000 words.————————————————–Guide for writingPresentation – Structure, style, grammar, fluency and effective communication of issues, findings and conclusions. Relevant use andformatting of references according to the Harvard system. It is assumed that at post graduate level the presentation of the report,case study, or other piece of work will be of a standard commonly expected in the commercial/ academic world. Simply copying (evenwith references cited) or simply paraphrasing sections of text from a variety of articles without adding your own coherentdiscussion/and or analysis does not support the communication of professional/academic knowledge in a submission or report.Understanding – demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the case study. This means that your research effortwill result in information for you to write a brief background or overview, but then allow you to focus only on the concepts and issuesspecific to this case study. General discussion loosely related to the concepts and issues under consideration will not demonstrateyour understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the specific case study/ assessment task.Scholarship – evidence of ability to research, analyse and critically evaluate materials relevant to the case study; academicallyrigorous use of supporting references; appropriate use of supporting course content. Scholarship includes being able to locateacademically rigorous literature, decide which is relevant to the topic under consideration and coherently discuss, the academicliterature. Further, it is necessary to provide evidence of your ability to research, analyse and critically evaluate the materialsyou have determined as relevant to the case study, and which also specifically address the requirements of the assignment. Widerreading is required. Simply using the academic references in the course material will not be considered as sufficiently scholarly forthis section.Adherence to assessment task requirements. This includes addressing each of the specific topic areas/ issues/ concepts required by theassessment task. The student needs to identify the specific issues relevant to task requirements, undertake relevant research todetermine the specific concepts and issues in the literature, and then link these back to the case study. Finally, an informed summaryor recommendation should reflect your critical analysis. If this approach is not evident, then the assignment will not be consideredas adhering to assessment task requirements.