The recognition of difference is the mark of responsibility in law (Manderson, 2003). Critically discuss in relation to sexual equality.
I will upload and list the references for this essay. Only these must be used.
Hello, In addition to the resources uploaded, here is a few more: 1. Foucault, M (1978) \’The Perverse Implantation\’ in The History of Sexuality, trans R. Hurley, Pantheon Books, New York. 2. W Morgan, (2001) \’Queering International Human Rights Law\’ In C. Stychin and D Herman Law and Sexuality: The Global Arena , Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 208 – 225. 3. Henderson, E. M. (2001) I\’d Rather be an outlaw: Identity, activism and decriminalisation in Tasmania. In C. Stychin and D Herman Law and Sexuality: The Global Arena , Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp 35 – 50. 4. Stychin, C consult his book from 2003. Note Introducton and Chapter One (especially the first half) in Governing Sexuality: The Changing Politics of Citizenship and Law Reform, Oxford, Hart Publishing
One thing to mention is that you are expected to explore key ideas through the lens of a case study. In doing so, take care to explain the detail of the case study in order to critique it through the theoretical work. The case study is uploaded (Toonen Case). Thank you.
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order