What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?
Following these steps:
1.summary:Give a brief summary of the work by your own word
- What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?
- What are the claimed contributions of the paper?
- How do the authors substantiate their claims?
- What are the conclusions?
2. evaluating :
Evaluate the work by answering these question :
- Is the research problem significant?
- Are the contributions significant?
- Are the claims valid?
3.Synthesis : generate any interesting thought you have on the work by consulting the following question:
- What is the crux of the research problem?
- What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?
- What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?
- What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?
- How can the research results be improved?
- Can the research results be applied to another context?
- What are the open problems raised by this work?
- Bottom-line: Can we do better than the authors?
Hi,I would like to do a paper review that is going to be short essay (3–4 pages) and single space on this article and each question should have a paragraph
http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/spanner-osdi2012.pdf
Following these steps:
1.summary:Give a brief summary of the work by your own word
- What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?
- What are the claimed contributions of the paper?
- How do the authors substantiate their claims?
- What are the conclusions?
2. evaluating :
Evaluate the work by answering these question :
- Is the research problem significant?
- Are the contributions significant?
- Are the claims valid?
3.Synthesis : generate any interesting thought you have on the work by consulting the following question:
- What is the crux of the research problem?
- What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?
- What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?
- What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?
- How can the research results be improved?
- Can the research results be applied to another context?
- What are the open problems raised by this work?
- Bottom-line: Can we do better than the authors?
