Comment on the comparability of information between these 2 companies.
Down below, I have calculated the current ratio rates of the 3 companies, which is current assets divided by current liabilities. And I’ve also calculated the quick ratio, which is cash plus accounts receivable, divided by current liabilities. Next part of the question, suppose Thornton is using FIFO for inventory valuation, and Edison is using LIFO. Comment on the comparability of information between these 2 companies. My comment is Thornton’s larger inventory balance is composed of current prices, whereas Edison’s inventory is composed of older, lower priced inventory. Edison’s use of LIFO lowers the current ratio so that inventory is not at a current price. The use of FIFO or LIFO does not affect the [INAUDIBLE] ratio, since inventory is not used in the calculation. The next part, if all short term notes are due on July 11 at 8:00 am, comment on each company’s ability to settle its obligation in a timely manner. And I stated that Edison has sufficient cash to meet the obligation. However, Stagg does not have enough cash on hand and would now have to liquidate short term investments. On the other hand, Thornton does not have enough cash or short term investments to meet the obligation. OK.




