Explain why it is important for an analyst to know how policy makers evaluate and use information.

You have 2 hours for the discussions.PAD 515 and PAD 520 (week 9) discussionsMake separate references for each discussion (DON\’T SUBMIT THE DISCUSSIONS ON THE DASHBOARD) – UPLOAD THEM HEREWeek 9 Discussion 1\”Communicating Policy Analysis\” Please respond to the following:Assume you are a candidate for a director of communications for a major metropolitan county. The job will require you to communicate to the public about public policy regarding transportation, environmental issues, education, taxes, as well as economic development. Explain at least three reasons and ways written and oral communication are important, and should be used to ensure public policy analyses are promoted and accepted by the general public.
Use the same scenario to explain at least two ways you would ensure public policy analyses are read and accepted by key stakeholders. Provide two reasons and an example to support your response.Week 9 Discussion 2\”Translating Policy Arguments\” Please respond to the following:Explain at least two key factors policy makers use when evaluating and using information provided to them in policy reports. Explain why it is important for an analyst to know how policy makers evaluate and use information.
From the case study, Case 9:1, highlight two key components a structured written narrative for a policy issue paper or policy memo. Then propose at least two benefits of developing a policy argument in this way. Provide an example to support your response.Week 9 Discussion\”Bringing Change to Public Leadership\” Please respond to the following:Note: Online students, please respond to two (2) of the following three (3) bulleted items.From the weekly readings and first e-Activity, predict two to three (2-3) challenges that a public leader may face when moving from a non-management position to a public leadership position. Recommend two to three (2-3) actions that a public leader can take in order to address these challenges. Provide a rationale for your response.
From the weekly readings and second e-Activity, suggest one(1) theory, two (2) leadership styles, and two (2) leadership characteristics that define your strengths as a public leader when applied to situations that may arise within the sphere of public administration. Justify your response.
From the weekly readings and third e-Activity, determine the strategic manner in which you could use your Emotional IQ in order to move you from a non-management position to a professional leader. Provide a rationale for your response.