Critical Analysis of existing evidance

Please read the attached article and letters, and then write a 2000-word critical analysis of the evidence regarding the relevance of modality

specificity to diagnosis of auditory processing disorder.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(7):572-89. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.7.6.
Factors influencing tests of auditory processing: a perspective on current issues and relevant concerns. Cacace AT, McFarland DJ.

Comment in:
Modality specificity is the preferred method for diagnosing the auditory processing disorder (APD): response to Moore and Ferguson. [J Am Acad

Audiol. 2014]

Modality Specificity trumps other methods for diagnosing the auditory processing disorder (APD): response to Dillon et al. [J Am Acad Audiol.

2014]

It is neither necessary nor desirable to test for abnormalities in other modalities when diagnosing auditory processing disorder (APD). [J Am

Acad Audiol. 2014]

Comments on “Factors influencing tests of auditory processing: a perspective on current issues and relevant concerns” by Tony Cacace and Dennis

McFarland. [J Am Acad Audiol. 2014]

TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!