Answer the following question 2,000 words, excluding bibliography

1 Describe the differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods (35%). Using Woywode (2002) and Jacoby et al. (2005), discuss how both methods contribute to our understanding of HRM and employment relations (65%).
Michael Woywode (2002), ‘Global Management Concept and Local Adaptions: Working Groups in the French and German Manufacturing Industry’, Organization Studies, volume 23, number 4, pp. 497-524.
Sanford Jacoby, Emily Nason and Kazuro Saguchi (2005), ‘The Role of the Senior HR Executive in Japan and the United States: Employment Relations, Corporate Governance, and Values, Industrial Relations, volume 44, number 2, pp. 207-241.
must read it ，i sent to you。
Structure of Assignment
（attention，must write like this structure）
1 ) Synopsis of the two articles (250 words)
2) Theory (550 words)
a. What is the relationship between theory and data; epistemology; ontology
b. Research design
c. Research Methods and data collection
d. Contribution: generalisability, validity, replication and reliability
3) Evaluation of the two articles (1,200 words)
a. What is the relationship between theory and data; epistemology; ontology
b. Research design
c. Research Methods and data collection
d. Contribution: generalisability, validity, replication and reliability
Your assignment will be evaluated on the basis of:
* Clarity of presentation
* Clear structure of your essay
* Depth and breadth of research
* Soundness of argument
* Theoretical and practical content
* Quality of the English writing
* Appropriate academic referencing in the text and in the bibliography

Characteristics of a good assignment
1. Describes and analyses an actual situation drawing usefully on course concepts.
2. Supports or challenges course concepts with examples.
3. Synthesises and develops ideas from the course.
4. Demonstrates sophisticated understanding of relevant material.
5. Has a clear argument and builds to a meaningful conclusion.
6. Shows evidence of wide reading.
7. Is well written and appropriately referenced.

Characteristics of a poor assignment
1. Fails to be relevant, or answer the question.
2. Relies mainly on description with very little analysis.
3. Never tells the reader what the main point is.
4. Builds an argument on poor assumptions.
5. Simply regurgitates course material, with no wider reading.
6. Shows little depth, and gives little sense of ‘grappling with a problem’.
7. Contains numerous grammar and orthographic mistakes and is inappropriately referenced.
In your assignment, please use 12 point, Times New Roman font, with 1.5 lines spacing. Use the referencing system in this document under the reading section (i.e. Harvard – see guidance from the library if unsure).

TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!