Self Evaluation Assessment Symbol/Color

Name: Team: ______________1. Self Evaluation Assessment Symbol/Color Date2. Instr/Grader Evaluated by Assessment Symbol/Color DateYes No Self-Regulation Issues (to be completed by Instructor/Grader)A. The electronic version was submitted on timeB. The front of the submitted assignment is this checklist with all Features self-assessedRequired ItemsYes No Checklist Item1. The work meets all or nearly all expectations of Assignment_formatting.docx.2. The work includes a Pre-Reflection and a Post-Reflection written in the first person.3. The work is professional and ethical4. All non-original work is properly quoted/paraphrased, and properly cited5. All required items, (with all subtasks), are present.a. Task 1 (parts a-f)b. Task 2ac. Task 2bd. Task 3 (parts a, b)e. Task 3c (both examples)f. Task3dg. There is a References section, appropriately and consistently formattedComments on the quality of the expected features and/or how they might be improvedRating*0 – 5 Rated Features: Rate the Quality of each of these Features:0 = Missing; 1 or 2 = Weak, 3 = OK/Good, 4 = Superior, 5 = Clearly outstanding6. Rate the quality of the information presented for Task 1 (number of species, quality and amount of data, quality of description of data searching)7. Rate the quality of Table presented in Task 1(consistent with Table presentation expectations, professional appearance)8. Rate the quality of Plots presented in Task 2a (consistent with Table formatting expectations, professional appearance, proper captioning)9. Rate the quality of Task 2b (quality of discussion, quality of writing/grammar/style)10. Rate the quality of the work for Tasks 3aand b(quality of examplesand discussion)11. Rate the quality of the work for Tasks 3c (quality of examples and discussion)12. Rate the quality of the work for Tasks 3d (depth of observation and insight)13. Rate the quality of the Pre-reflection and Post-assignment Reflection (depth of insight in addressing issues as described in Assignment_formatting.docx)Extra Credit* (each can add up to 0.15 to Rated item Average)Yes Describe features of your work that you believe qualify for “Extra Credit”1.2.* If you self-assess rated item at 4 or 5, or claim Extra Credit, you MUST explain WHY, and ideally explain why using the reasons given in the course’s Assessment/Grading document.Results of Initial Assessment (to be completed by Instructor/Grader)If substantially incomplete (NC), grade is 0; if any requirements not met or average of Rated features less than 2.8, grade is 50 (NI); otherwise, Grade = average of Rated Features + Extra CreditEMNINC E, all Yes’s for Required Items, no Rated Items below 3, Rated Item average above 4.6M, all Yes’s for Required Items, Rated Item average at or above 3NI, any No’s for Required Items or Rated Item average below 3NC, there is little to no work to be assessed; Rated item average below 1.8Pre-ReflectionAssignment #1(Put pre-reflection text here. Be sure to edit the header just above and to the right – double click on any of the text to edit)Task 1? give your section headers a descriptive name: do not call them “task 1”, etc.)(Insert content here. Insert page breaks as needed.)Task 2(Insert content here. Insert page breaks as needed).Task 3(Insert content here. Insert page breaks as needed).References(Start this section on a new page).Appendix A: (title of Appendix A)(Appendices are usually optional. each appendix begins on a new page. continue regular page numbering. Be sure to edit the header.)Post-Assignment-ReflectionAssignment 1(Put post-assignment-reflection text here. Be sure to edit the header)